Chapter 15: Composers

Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven

Music of Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)

Born in 1732, Joseph Haydn grew up in a small village that was located about a six-hour coach ride east of Vienna (today the two are about an hour apart by car). His family loved to sing together, and perceiving that their son had musical talent, apprenticed six-year-old Joseph Haydn to a relative who was a schoolmaster and choirmaster. As an apprentice, Haydn learned harpsichord and violin and sang in the church. So distinct was Haydn’s voice that he was recommended to Vienna’s St. Stephen’s Cathedral’s music director. In 1740 Haydn became a student of St. Stephen’s Cathedral. He sang with the St. Stephen’s Cathedral boys’ choir for almost ten years, until his voice broke (changed). After searching, he found a job as valet to the Italian opera composer Nicola Porpora and most likely started studying music theory and music composition in a systematic way at that time. He composed a comic musical and eventually became a chapel master for a Czech nobleman. When this noble family fell into hard times, they released Haydn. In 1761, he became a Vice-Chapel Master for an even wealthier nobleman, the Hungarian Prince Esterházy. Haydn spent almost thirty years working for their family. He was considered a skilled servant, who soon became their head Chapel Master and was highly prized, especially by the second and most musical of the Esterházy princes for whom Haydn worked.

The Esterházys kept Haydn very busy: he wrote music, which he played both for and with his patrons, ran the orchestra, and staged operas. In 1779, Haydn’s contract was renegotiated, allowing him to write and sell music outside of the Esterházy family. Within a decade, he was the most famous composer in Europe. In 1790, the musical Prince Nikolaus Esterházy died and his son Anton downsized the family’s musical activities. This shift allowed Haydn to accept an offer to give a concert in London, England, where his music was very popular. Haydn left Vienna for London in December. For the concerts there, he composed an opera, symphonies, and chamber music, all of which were extremely popular. Haydn revisited London twice in the following years, 1791 to 1795, earning—after expenses—as much as he had in twenty years of employment with the Esterházys. Nonetheless, a new Esterházy prince decided to reestablish the family’s musical foothold, so Haydn returned to their service in 1796. In the last years of his life, he wrote two important oratorios (he had been much impressed by performances of Handel’s oratorios while in London) as well as more chamber music.

Overview of Haydn’s Music

Like his younger contemporaries Mozart and Beethoven, Joseph Haydn composed in all the genres of his day. From a historical perspective, his contributions to the string quartet and the symphony are particularly significant: in fact, he is often called the Father of the Symphony. His music is also known for its motivic construction, use of folk tunes, and musical wit. Central to Haydn’s compositional process was his ability to take small numbers of short musical motives and vary them in enough ways to provide interesting music for movements that were several minutes long. Folk-like as well as popular tunes of the day can be heard in many of his compositions for piano, string quartet, and orchestra. Contemporary audiences and critics seemed to appreciate this mixing of musical complexity and the familiar. Ernst Ludwig Gerber (1790-92), an important eighteenth-century musical connoisseur, wrote that Haydn “possessed the great art of appearing familiar in his themes” (Historisch-biographisches Lexikon der Tonkünstler of 1790-1792). Additionally, many of his contemporaries remarked on Haydn’s musical wit or humor. Several of his music compositions play on the listeners’ expectations, especially through the use of surprise rests, held-out notes, and sudden dynamic changes.

Why is it called the Surprise Symphony? The secret of Haydn’s success

Focus Composition:

Haydn, String Quartet in D Major, Op. 20, no. 4 (1772)

The string quartet was one of the important performing forces and genres of the Classical period, and Haydn was one of its most important composers. Over the course of his life, Haydn wrote sixty-eight quartets, many of which were played both by Haydn’s aristocratic patrons and published and available for the amateur musician to purchase and play. In fact, many late eighteenth-century writers (including the famous German poet Goethe) referred to the string quartet as “a conversation between four intelligent people,” in this case, the four people being the first and second violinist, violist, and cellist.

The string quartet by Haydn which we will study is one of six quartets that he wrote in 1772 and published as opus twenty quartets in 1774 (roughly speaking, the “twenty” meant that this was Haydn’s twentieth publication to date). In many ways, this follows the norms of other string quartets of the day. It is in four movements, with a fast first movement in sonata form, a slow second movement that uses a theme and variations form, a moderate-tempo third movement that is like a minuet, and a fourth fast movement, here in sonata form. As we will see, the third movement is subtitled “alla Zingarese,” or “in the style of the Hungarians” (a good example of Haydn being “folky”). The entire quartet comprises a little over twenty minutes of music.

First, we will listen to the first movement, which is marked “allegro di molto,” or very fast, and is in D major, as expected given the string quartet’s title. It uses sonata form, and as stated earlier, in the exposition, the home key and musical themes of the movement are introduced, or “exposed.” In the development, those themes are broken apart and combined in new and different ways, or “developed.” In the recapitulation, the home key and original musical themes return; in other words, they are “recapitulated” or “recapped.”

The exposition, development, and recapitulation are further broken into subsections to correspond to modulations in keys and the presentation of new and different themes. For the time being, simply listen for the main sections of sonata form in the first movement of Haydn’s string quartet. You might also listen for Haydn’s motivic style. In the first musical theme, you’ll hear three motives. The first motive, for example, repeats the same pitch three times. The second motive consists of an arched musical phrase that ascends and descends and outlines the pitches of an important chord of the movement. The final motive that Haydn packs into his opening musical theme is a musical turn, or a decorative series of notes that move by step, revolving around a primary note. Each of these motives is heard repeatedly through the rest of the movement.

Listening Guide: String Quartet in D major, Op. 20, no. 4 (I: Allegro di molto)

Performed by: New Oxford String Quartet

Violinists: Jonathon Crow and Andrew Wan, Violist: Eric Nowlin, Cellist: Brian Manker

  • Composer: Haydn
  • Composition: String Quartet in D major, Op. 20, no. 4 (I: Allegro di molto)
  • Date: 1772
  • Genre: String quartet
  • Form: I: Allegro di molto is in sonata form
  • Performing Forces: string quartet, i.e., two violins, one viola, one cello

What we want you to remember about this composition:

  • It uses sonata form: exposition, development, and recapitulation
  • It is in D major
  • Haydn’s style here is very motivic

Other things to listen for:

  • The interplay of the two violins, viola, and cello, in ways that might remind you of a “conversation between four people.”
  • The subsections of the sonata form
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
0:00 First theme in D major consists of three motives, including a first repeated note motive; first heard in the first violin and then passed to the other instruments, too. EXPOSITION: First theme
0:34 Uses fast triplets (three notes per beat) in sequences to modulate to the key of A major transition
1:12 New combinations of motives in themes in A major: starts with three-note motive, then a rapidly rising scale in the first violin, then more triplets, a more lyrical leap- ing motive, and ending with more triplets. Second theme and closing theme
2:23 Sequences the repeated note motive DEVELOPMENT
2:40 Sounds like the first theme in the home key, but then shifts to an- other key. Repeated note and fast triplet motives follow in sequences, modulating to different keys (major and minor). No Data
2:50 A pause and the first motive, but not in the home key of D major; triplets, the more lyrical leaping motive and then a pause and the first motive, but still not in the home key. No Data
3:35 After a pause, the first theme in D major RECAPITULATION: First theme
4:10 Uses fast triplets like the exposition’s transition section, followed by more lyrical motives, but it does not modulate away from D major. Transition-like section
4:30 Return of the three-note motive followed by a rapidly rising scale in the first violin, then more triplets, a more lyrical leaping motive, and ending with more triplets but still in D major (was in A major in the exposition). Second theme and closing theme

The third movement of Haydn’s String Quartet in D major, Op. 20, no. 4 uses a moderate tempo (it is marked “allegretto,” in this case, a slow allegro) and the form of a minuet. Keeping with the popular culture of the day, a great number of Haydn’s compositions included minuet movements.

Here, however, we see Haydn playing on our expectations for the minuet and writing a movement that is alla zingarese. The minuet was not a Hungarian dance, so the listener’s experience and expectations are altered when the third movement sounds more like a lively Hungarian folk dance than the stately western-European minuet. (For comparison’s sake, you can listen to the second movement of Haydn’s String Quartet in E flat, Op. 20, no. 1, which is a much more traditional-sounding minuet.) Haydn retains the form of the stylized minuet, which consisted of a minuet and a trio. The trio consists of musical phrases that contrast with what was heard in the minuet: the trio got its name from an earlier practice of assigning this music to a group of three wind players. Here the entire string quartet plays throughout. After the trio, the group returns to the minuet, resulting in a minuet (A)—trio (B)— minuet (A). As was the custom, Haydn did not write out the minuet music at its return—remember paper was much more expensive 200 years ago than it is today. Instead, Haydn wrote two Italian words: “da capo”. As these words were used by all composers of the day, the players knew immediately to flip to the beginning of the movement and repeat the minuet, generally without repeats.

Listening Guide: String Quartet in D major, op. 20, no. 4 (III. Allegretto alla zingarese)

Performed by: New Oxford String Quartet

Violinists: Jonathon Crow and Andrew Wan, Violist: Eric Nowlin, Cellist: Brian Manker

  • Composer: Haydn
  • Composition: String Quartet in D major, op. 20, no. 4 (III. Allegretto alla zingarese)
  • Date: 1772
  • Genre: String quartet
  • Form: III. Allegretto alla zingarese uses the form of a minuet and trio, that is, Minuet (A) Trio (B) Minuet (A).
  • Performing Forces: string quartet, i.e., two violins, one viola, one cello

What we want you to remember about this composition:

  • It is in triple time and a moderate tempo, like most minuets
  • The music for the repeat of the minuet is not written out; instead, Haydn writes “da capo” at the end of the Trio
  • Instead of sounding like a stately minuet, it sounds more like a lively Hungarian dance

Other things to listen for:

  • It hardly sounds like triple meter, because Haydn writes accents on beats two and three instead of mainly on beat one
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
0:00 Lots of unexpected accents on beats two and three of the triple time me- ter; homophonic texture: the first violin gets the solo and the other voices accompany; in D major MINUET: A
0:09 a repeats
0:17 Similar to a, but the melody is even more disjunct, with more leaps. B
0:27 b repeats
0:40 Accents back on the first beat of each measure (that is, of each measure of the triple meter); homophonic texture: the cello gets the solo and the other voices accompany; still in D major TRIO: Cc
0:56 Similar to c; note the drone pitches in the 2nd violin and viola accom- paniment at the beginning of the phrase dd
1:13 See above MINUET: A
1:20 See above B

Focus Composition:

Haydn, Symphony No. 94 in G Major, “Surprise”

Haydn is also often called the Father of the Symphony because he wrote over 100 symphonies, which, like his string quartets, span most of his compositional career. As already noted, the Classical orchestra featured primarily strings, with flutes and oboes (and, with Haydn’s last symphonies, clarinets) for woodwinds, trumpets and horns for brass, and timpani (and occasionally other drums or the cymbals or triangle) for percussion. The symphony gradually took on the four-movement form that was a norm for over a century, although as we will see, composers sometimes relished departing from the norm.

Haydn wrote some of his most successful symphonies during his time in London. His Symphony No. 94 in G Major, which premiered in London in 1792, is a good example of Haydn’s thwarting musical expectations for witty ends. Like most symphonies of its day, the first movement is in sonata form. (Haydn does open the symphony with a brief, slow introduction before launching into the first movement proper.)

Haydn’s sense of humor is most evident in the moderately slow andante second movement which starts like a typical theme and variations movement consisting of a musical theme that the composer then varies several times. Each variation retains enough of the original theme to be recognizable but adds other elements to provide interest. The themes used for theme and variations movements tended to be simple, tuneful melody lines. In this case, the theme consists of an eight-measure musical phrase that is repeated. This movement, like many movements of Classical symphonies and string quartets, ends with a coda.

Why did Haydn write such a loud chord at the end of the second statement of the a phrase of the theme? Commentators have long speculated that Haydn may have noticed that audience members tended to drift off to sleep in slow and often quietly lyrical middle movements of symphonies and decided to give them an abrupt wakeup. Haydn himself said nothing of the sort, although his letters, as well as his music, do suggest that he was attentive to his audience’s opinions and attempted at every juncture to give them music that was new and interesting: for Haydn, that clearly meant playing upon his listener’s expectations in ways that might even be considered humorous.

Why is it called the Surprise Symphony? The secret of Haydn’s success

Listening Guide: Symphony No. 94 in G major, “Surprise” (II. Andante)

Performed by: The Orchestra of the 18th Century, conducted by Frans Brüggen.

  • Composer: Haydn
  • Composition: Symphony No. 94 in G major, “Surprise” (II. Andante)
  • Date: 1791
  • Genre: Symphony
  • Form: II. Andante is in theme and variations form
  • Performing Forces: Classical orchestra here with 1st violin section, 2nd violin section, viola section, cellos/bass section, 2 flutes, 2 oboes, 2 trumpets, 2 horns, 2 bassoons, and timpani

What we want you to remember about this composition:

  • It is in theme and variations form
  • The very loud chord that ends the first phrase of the theme provides the “surprise”

Other things to listen for:

  • The different ways that Haydn varies the theme: texture, register, instrumentation, key
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
8:46 Theme: aa Eight-measure theme with a question and answer structure. The “question” ascends and descends and then the “answer” ascends and descends, and ends with a very loud chord (the answer). In C major and most- ly consonant. In homophonic texture, with melody in the violins and accompaniment by the other strings; soft dynam- ics and then very soft staccato notes until ending with a very loud chord played by the full orchestra, the “surprise.”
9:21 b Contrasting more legato eight-measure phrase ends like the staccato motives of the a phrase without the loud chord;
9:39 b Repetition of b
9:57 Variation 1: aa Theme in the second violins and violas under a high- er-pitched 1st violin counter- melody. Still in C major and mostly consonant.

 

Ascending part of the theme is forte and the descending part of the phrase is piano; the first-violin countermelody is an interesting line but the overall texture is still homophonic.

10:30 bb Similar in texture and harmo-nies; piano dynamic throughout
11:05 Variation 2: aa The first four measures are in unison monophonic texture and very loud and the second four measures (the answer) are in homophonic texture and very soft; In C minor
11:41 Develops motives from A and B phrases In C minor with more disso- nance; very loud in dynamics; The motives are passed from instrument to instrument in polyphonic imitation.
12:20 Variation 3: aa Back in C major.

The oboes and flutes get the a phrase with fast repeated notes in a higher register; the sec- ond time, the violins play the

a phrase at original pitch; uses homophonic texture through-

out.

12:56 bb The flutes and oboes play countermelodies while the strings play the theme.
13:27 Variation 4: ab The winds get the first a phrase and then it returns to the first violin; very loud for the first statement of a and very soft for the second statement of a; ho- mophonic texture throughout.
14:01 bb + extension Shifting dynamics
14:50 Coda

The third movement of Haydn’s “Surprise” Symphony is a rather traditional minuet and trio movement. The fourth movement is equally traditional; it uses a light-hearted form called the rondo. As stated before, in a rondo, a musical refrain, labeled as “A,” alternates with other sections, alternately called B, C, D, etc. See if you can hear the recurrence of the refrain as you listen to this joyful conclusion to the symphony.

Listening Guide: Symphony No. 94 in G major, “Surprise” (IV. Finale: Allegro Molto)

Performed by: The Orchestra of the 18th Century, conducted by Frans Brüggen.

  • Composer: Haydn
  • Composition: Symphony No. 94 in G major, “Surprise” (IV. Finale: Allegro Molto)
  • Date: 1791
  • Genre: Symphony
  • Form: IV. Finale: Allegro molto is in a (sonata) rondo form
  • Performing Forces: Classical orchestra here with 1st violin section, 2nd violin section, viola section, cellos/bass section, 2 flutes, 2 oboes, 2 trumpets, 2 horns, 2 bassoons, and timpani

What we want you to remember about this composition:

  • This movement uses a rondo form
  • It is at a very fast tempo
  • It uses a full orchestra

Other things to listen for:

  • The alternation of the different sections of the rondo form
  • The changes in key and texture
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
19:17 Fast and tuneful theme in duple time in homophonic texture; in G major, with more dissonances as the music modulates to… A
20:19 D major for a different tuneful theme that opens descending motion; B
20:42 Returns to G major and the first theme; texture becomes more poly- phonic as it… A’
20:49 modulates through several keys. C
21:17 Return to the first theme in G major A
21:26 Opening motive of the first theme in minor and then sequences on other motives that modulate

through minor keys.

D
21:47 Back in G major with the first theme and other music of A that is extended into a coda that brings

back b momentarily and juxtaposes

forte and piano dynamics before its rousing close.

A and coda

Haydn’s symphonies greatly influenced the musical style of both Mozart and Beethoven; indeed, these two composers learned how to develop motives from Haydn’s earlier symphonies. Works such as the Surprise Symphony were especially shaping for the young Beethoven, who, as we will later discuss, was taking music composition lessons from Haydn at about the same time that Haydn was composing his Symphony No. 94 before his trip to London.

Music of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791)

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was born in Salzburg, Austria. His father, Leopold Mozart, was an accomplished violinist of the Archbishop of Salzburg’s court. Additionally, Leopold had written a respected book on the playing of the violin. At a very young age, Wolfgang began his career as a composer and performer. A prodigy, his talent far exceeded any in music, past his contemporaries. He began writing music prior to the age of five. At the age of six, Wolfgang performed in the court of Empress Maria Theresa.

Mozart’s father was quite proud of his children, both being child prodigies. At age seven, Wolfgang, his father, and his sister Maria Anna (nicknamed “Nannerl”) embarked on a tour featuring Wolfgang in London, Munich, and Paris. As was customary at the time, Wolfgang, the son, was promoted and pushed ahead with his musical career by his father. While his sister, the female, grew up traditionally, married, and eventually took care of her father Leopold in his later years. However, while the two siblings were still performing, these tours occurred when Wolfgang was between the ages of six and seventeen. The tours, though, were quite demeaning for the young musical genius in that he was often looked upon as just a superficial genre of entertainment rather than being respected as a musical prodigy. He would often be asked to identify the tonality of a piece while listening to it or asked to sight read and perform with a cloth over his hands while at the piano. Still, the tours allowed young Mozart to accumulate knowledge about musical styles across Europe. As a composer prior to his teens, the young Mozart had already composed religious works, symphonies, solo sonatas, an opera buffa, and Bastien and Bastienne, an operetta; in short, he had quickly mastered all the forms of music.

Back in Salzburg, Mozart was very unhappy due to being musically restrained by the restrictions of his patron, the Archbishop of Salzburg, Hieronymus von Colloredo. At approximately the age of twenty-five, he moved to Vienna, became a free artist (agent), and pursued other opportunities. Another likely reason for Wolfgang’s ultimate departure to Vienna was to become independent of his father. Though Leopold was well-meaning and had sacrificed a great deal to ensure the future and happiness of his son, he was an overbearing father. Thus at the age of twenty-five, Mozart married Constance Weber. Mozart’s father did not view the marriage favorably and this marriage served as a wedge severing Wolfgang’s close ties to his father.

Wolfgang’s new life in Vienna however was not easy. For almost ten years, he struggled financially, unable to find the secure financial environment in which he had grown up. The music patronage system was still the main way for musicians to prosper and thrive: several times, Mozart was considered for patron employment but was not hired. Having hired several other musicians ahead of Mozart, Emperor Joseph II hired Mozart to basically compose dances for the court’s balls. As the tasks were far beneath his musical genius, Mozart was quite bitter about this assignment.

While in Vienna, Mozart relied on his teaching to sustain him and his family. He also relied on the entertainment genre of the concert. He would write piano concertos for annual concerts. Their programs would also include some arias, solo improvisation, and possibly an overture by another composer.

The peak of Mozart’s career success occurred in 1786 with the writing of The Marriage of Figaro (libretto by Lorenza da Ponte). The opera was a hit in Prague and Vienna. The city of Prague, so impressed with the opera, commissioned another piece by Mozart. Mozart, with da Ponte again as librettist, then composed Don Giovanni. The second opera left the audience somewhat confused. Mozart’s luster and appeal seemed to have passed. As a composer, Mozart was trying to expand the spectrum, or horizons, of the musical world. Therefore, his music sometimes had to be viewed more than once by the audience in order for them to understand and appreciate it. Mozart was pushing the musical envelope beyond the standard entertainment expected by his aristocratic audience, and patrons, in general, did not appreciate it. In a letter to Mozart, Emperor Joseph II wrote of Don Giovanni that the opera was perhaps better than The Marriage of Figaro but that it did not set well on the palette of the Viennese. Mozart quickly fired back, responding that the Viennese perhaps needed more time to understand it.

In the final year of his life, Mozart with librettist (actor/poet) Emanuel Schikaneder, wrote a very successful opera for the Viennese English Theatre, The Magic Flute. The newly acclaimed famous composer was quickly hired to write a piece (as well as attend) the coronation of the new Emperor, Leopold II, as King of Bohemia. The festive opera that Mozart composed for this event was called The Clemency of Titus. Its audience, overly indulged and exhausted from the coronation, was not impressed with Mozart’s work. Mozart returned home depressed and broken and began working on a Requiem, which, coincidentally, would be his last composition.

The Requiem was commissioned by a count who intended to pass the work off as his own. Mozart’s health failed shortly after receiving this commission and the composer died, just before his thirty-sixth birthday, before completing the piece. Mozart’s favorite student, Franz Xaver Sűssmayr, completed the mass from Mozart’s sketch scores, with some insertions of his own, while rumors spread that Mozart was possibly poisoned by another contemporary composer. In debt at the time of his death, Mozart was given a common burial. As one commentator wrote:

Thus, “without a note of music, forsaken by all he held dear, the remains of this Prince of Harmony were committed to the earth, not even in a grave of their own, but in the common fosse affected to the indiscriminate sepulture of homeless mendicants and nameless waifs.” (Crowest, “An Estimate of Mozart,” The Eclectic Magazine: Foreign Literature Vol. 55; Vol 118 P. 464)

Overview of Mozart’s Music

From Mozart’s youth, his musical intellect and capability were unmatched. His contemporaries often noted that Mozart seemed to have already heard, edited, listened to, and visualized entire musical works in his mind before raising a pen to compose them on paper. When he took pen in hand, he would basically transcribe the work in his head onto the manuscript paper. Observers also said that Mozart could listen and carry on conversations with others while transcribing his music to paper.

Mozart was musically very prolific in his short life. He composed operas, church music, a Requiem, string quartets, string quintets, mixed quintets and quartets, concertos, piano sonatas, and many lighter chamber pieces (such as divertimentos), including his superb A Little Night Music (Eine kleine Nachtmusik). His violin and piano sonatas are among the best ever written both in form and emotional content. Six of his quartets were dedicated to Haydn, whose influence Mozart celebrated in their preface.

Mozart: Eine kleine Nachtmusik

Mozart additionally wrote exceptional keyboard music, particularly since he was respected as one of the finest pianists of the Classical period. He loved the instrument dearly and wrote many solo works, as well as more than twenty piano concertos for piano and orchestra, thus contributing greatly to the concerto’s popularity as an acceptable medium. Many of these concerti were premiered at Mozart’s annual public fundraising concerts. Of his many piano solo pieces, the Fantasia in C minor K 475 and the Sonata (in C minor) K 457 are representative of his most famous.

Mozart: Piano Sonata No 14 C minor K 457

Mozart composed more than forty symphonies, the writing of which extended across his entire career. He was known for the full and rich instrumentation and voicing of his symphonies. His conveying of emotion and mood are especially portrayed in these works. His final six symphonies, written in the last decade of his life, are the most artistically self-motivated independent of art patronage and supervision that might stifle creativity. Mozart’s late and great symphonies include the Haffner in D (1782), the Linz in C (1783), the Prague in D (1786), and his last three symphonies composed in 1788. Mozart’s final symphony probably was not performed prior to his death. In addition to the symphonies and piano concertos, Mozart composed other major instrumental works for clarinet, violin, and horn in concertos.

Mozart: Symphony No. 35 “Haffner”

Focus Composition:

Mozart, Piano Concerto No. 20 in D Minor, K. 466 [1785]

Classical composers like Mozart took the Baroque concerto for soloist and orchestra and expanded it into a much larger form. Like Vivaldi’s concertos, Mozart’s concertos were generally in three movements, with fast, slow, and fast tempos, respectively. The first movements of Mozart’s concertos also featured the alternation of ritornello sections and solo sections. Mozart, however, also applied the dynamics of sonata form to the first movements of his concertos, resulting in a form that we now call double exposition form. In double exposition form, the first statement of the exposition was assigned to the orchestra, and the second statement of the exposition was assigned to the soloist with orchestral accompaniment in the background. The alternation between orchestra and soloist sections continues in the development and recapitulation. Near the end of the recapitulation and during the final orchestra exposition, the orchestra holds a suspenseful chord, at which point the soloist enters and the orchestra drops out. For a minute or longer, the soloist plays a cadenza. A cadenza is a solo section that sounds improvised, though sometimes composers or performers wrote these ahead of time, as is the case with this concerto (the recording cited by the text features a cadenza that was written by Beethoven). A cadenza normally ends with the pianist sustaining a chord (often with a trill) signaling the orchestra’s final entrance in the piece, playing the last phrase of the ritornello to bring the movement to a conclusion. You can see an example of how ritornello form and sonata form were merged in a double exposition form:

Double Exposition Form

Ritornello Form

Ritornello

Solo Section

Ritornello

Solo Section

Ritornello

Solo Section

Ritornello (including cadenza)

Sonata Form

[Orchestral] EXPOSITION

[Solo] EXPOSITION

DEVELOPMENT

RECAPITULATION

The first movement of Mozart’s Concerto No. 20 in D minor, K. 466 is a good example of double exposition form.

Listening Guide: Piano Concerto No. 20 in D minor, K466, First Movement 1. Allegro (Cadenzas by Beethoven)

Performed by: Martha Argerich, piano, with the Orchestra di Padova e del Veneto, conducted by Alexandre Rabinovitch

  • Composer: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
  • Composition: Piano Concerto No. 20 in D minor, K466, First Movement 1. Allegro (Cadenzas by Beethoven)
  • Date: 1785
  • Genre: Piano Concerto
  • Form: Double Exposition Form
  • Performing Forces: Piano soloist and Classical orchestra

What we want you to remember about this composition:

  • It is in double exposition form.
  • At the end of the recapitulation, in the final ritornello, the orchestra drops out and the soloist plays a cadenza that sounds improvised.
  • The movement (like the concerto as a whole) starts and ends in D minor and is one of only two Mozart concertos in a minor key
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
0:00 Orchestra alone, in a minor key throughout. Orchestral Exposition
2:18 Spotlight on the solo piano, with some accompaniment from the orchestra; the key modulates to F major. Solo Exposition
5:05 Focus switches back and forth from solo piano and the orchestra while the music develops the themes, motives, and harmonies from the exposition. Development
7:23 Back in D minor with the first themes from the exposition. Frequent alternation between the soloist and orchestra as they share the themes. Recapitulation: Ritornello & solo sections
10:17 Orchestra begins the final ritornello and then sustains a suspenseful chord. Recapitulation: Final ritornello
10:35 The pianist plays in a improvisatory manner, shifting suddenly between different motives, tempos, and styles. Listen for many ornaments such as trills and rapid and virtu- osic scales. After a final, extended series of trills (starting at 12:17), the orchestra returns for… Recapitulation: Cadenza
12:30 the final phrase of the ritornello and movement (which ends in D minor). Recapitulation: Ritornello concludes

Focus Composition:

Mozart, Symphony No. 41 in C Major, K. 551 (1788)

Like Haydn, Mozart also wrote symphonies. Mozart’s final symphony, the Symphony No. 41 in major, K. 551 is one of his greatest compositions. It very quickly acquired the nickname “Jupiter,” a reference to the Greek god, perhaps because of its grand scale and use of complex musical techniques. For example, Mozart introduced more modulations and key changes in this piece than was typical. The symphony opens with a first movement in sonata form with an exposition, development, and recapitulation.

Below you will find an animated listening guide providing guidance to various sections and identifying the different musical elements as they are introduced.

Mozart: Symphony No. 41, Allegro vivace

Also, listen to the first movement with the listening guide below.

Listening Guide: Piano Concerto No. 20 in D minor, K466, First Movement 1. Allegro (Cadenzas by Beethoven)

Performed by: (Video of live orchestral performance); The Chamber Orchestra of Europe, conducted by Nikolaus Harnoncourt

  • Composer: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
  • Composition: Symphony No. 41 in C Major, K. 551 — 1st Movement, Allegro Vivace
  • Date: 1788
  • Genre: Symphony
  • Form: Sonata Form
  • Performing Forces: Classical orchestra

What we want you to remember about this composition:

  • Listen to the different sections identified in sonata form.
  • During the development section you will feel the instability of the piece induced by the key changes and ever changing instrument voicings.

Other things to listen for:

  • Its melodic line is mostly conjunct.
  • Its melody contains many melismas.
  • It has a Latin text sung in a strophic form.

Note:

  • Time index follows the performance below
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
0:00 Full orchestra.

Stated twice-First loud and then soft short responses.

EXPOSITION: Opening triplet motive
0:18 The forte dynamic continues, with emphasis on dotted rhythms.

Winds perform opening melody followed by staccato string answer;

Full bowed motion in strings.

First theme in C major
1:30 Motive of three notes continues; Soft lyrical theme with moving ornamentation in accompaniment. Pause followed by second theme of the exposition
2:08 Sudden forte dynamic. Energy increases until sudden softening to third pause;

Brass fanfares with compliment of

the tympani.

Second Pause followed by transition to build tension
2:41 Theme played in the strings with grace notes used.

Melody builds to a closing;

A light singable melody derived from Mozart’s aria “Un baccio di mano”

After the third pause, the third theme is introduced
3:12 The entire exposition repeats itself
6:21 Transition played by flute, oboe and bassoon followed by third theme in strings;

Music.

DEVELOPMENT SECTION:

Transition to third theme

6:40 Modulations in this section add to the instability of the section; Starts like the exposition but with repetition in different keys. Modulation to the minor
7:21 Slight introduction of third theme motif;

Quiet and subdued.

Implied recapitulation: “Transition”
8:05 Now started by the oboes and bassoons;

Now in C minor, not E flat major, which provides a more ominous tone.

Recapitulation in original key: First theme
9:29 No Data Pause followed by second theme
10:39 After a sudden piano articulation of the SSSL motive, suddenly ends in a loud and bombastic manner: Fate threatens;

Re-emphasizes C minor.

Third theme
10:53 No Data Closing material similar to exposition
11:09 Full orchestra at forte dynamic. Closing cadence for the movement

It is impossible to know how many more operas and symphonies Mozart would have written had he lived into his forties, fifties, or even sixties. Haydn’s music written after the death of Mozart shows the influence of his younger contemporary, and Beethoven’s early music was also shaped by Mozart’s. In fact, in 1792, a twenty-something Beethoven was sent to Vienna with the expressed purpose of receiving “the spirit of Mozart from the hands of Haydn.”

Music of Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827)

Beethoven was born in Bonn in December of 1770. Bonn sat at the Western edge of the Germanic lands, on the Rhine River. Those in Bonn were well-acquainted with the traditions of the Netherlands and of the French; they would be some of the first to hear of the revolutionary ideas coming out of France in the 1780s. The area was ruled by the Elector of Cologne. As the Kapellmeister for the Elector, Beethoven’s grandfather held the most important musical position in Bonn; he died when Beethoven was three years old. Beethoven’s father, Johann Beethoven, sang in the Electoral Chapel his entire life. While he may have provided his son with music lessons at an early stage of Ludwig’s life, it appears that Johann had given into alcoholism and depression, especially after the death of Maria Magdalena Keverich (Johann’s wife and Ludwig’s mother) in 1787.

Although hundreds of miles east of Vienna, the Electorate of Cologne was under the jurisdiction of the Austrian Habsburg empire that was ruled by this Eastern European city. The close ties between these lands made it convenient for the Elector, with the support of the music-loving Count Ferdinand Ernst Gabriel von Waldstein (1762-1823), to send Beethoven to Vienna to further his music training. Ferdinand was the youngest of an aristocratic family in Bonn. He greatly supported the arts and became a patron of Beethoven. Beethoven’s first stay in Vienna in 1787 was interrupted by the death of his mother. In 1792, he returned to Vienna for good.

Perhaps the most universally known fact of Beethoven’s life is that he went deaf. You can read entire books on the topic; for our present purposes, the timing of his hearing loss is most important. It was at the end of the 1790s that Beethoven first recognized that he was losing his hearing. By 1801, he was writing about it to his most trusted friends. It is clear that the loss of his hearing was an existential crisis for Beethoven. During the fall of 1802, he composed a letter to his brothers that included his last will and testament, a document that we’ve come to know as the “Heiligenstadt Testament” named after the small town of Heiligenstadt, north of the Viennese city center, where he was staying. The “Heiligenstadt Testament” provides us insight to Beethoven’s heart and mind. Most striking is his statement that his experiences of social alienation, connected to his hearing loss, “drove me almost to despair, a little more of that and I have ended my life—it was only my art that held me back.” The idea that Beethoven found in art a reason to live suggests both his valuing of art and a certain self-awareness of what he had to offer music. Beethoven and his physicians tried various means to counter the hearing loss and improve his ability to function in society. By 1818, however, Beethoven was completely deaf.

Beethoven had a complex personality. Although he read the most profound philosophers of his day and was compelled by lofty philosophical ideals, his own writing was broken and his personal accounts show errors in basic math. He craved close human relationships yet had difficulty sustaining them. By 1810, he had secured a lifetime annuity from local noblemen, meaning that Beethoven never lacked for money. Still, his letters—as well as the accounts of contemporaries—suggest a man suspicious of others and preoccupied with the compensation he was receiving.

Overview of Beethoven’s Music

Upon arriving in Vienna in the early 1790s, Beethoven supported himself by playing piano at salons and by giving music lessons. Salons were gatherings of literary types, visual artists, musicians, and thinkers, often hosted by noblewomen for their friends. Here Beethoven both played music of his own composition and improvised upon musical themes given to him by those in attendance.

In April of 1800, Beethoven gave his first concert for his own benefit, held at the important Burgtheater. As typical for the time, the concert included a variety of types of music, vocal, orchestral, and even, in this case, chamber music. Many of the selections were by Haydn and Mozart, for Beethoven’s music from this period was profoundly influenced by these two composers.

Scholars have traditionally divided Beethoven’s composing into three chronological periods: early, middle, and late. Like all efforts to categorize, this one proposes boundaries that are open to debate. Probably most controversial is the dating of the end of the middle period and the beginning of the late period. Beethoven did not compose much music between 1814 and 1818, meaning that any division of those years would fall more on Beethoven’s life than on his music.

In general, the music of Beethoven’s first period (roughly until 1803) reflects the influence of Haydn and Mozart. Beethoven’s second period (1803-1814) is sometimes called his “heroic” period, based on his recovery from depression documented in the “Heiligenstadt Testament” mentioned earlier. This period includes such music compositions as his Third Symphony, which Beethoven subtitled “Eroica” (that is, heroic), the Fifth Symphony, and Beethoven’s one opera, Fidelio, which took the French Revolution as its inspiration. Other works composed during this time include Symphonies No. 3 through No. 8 and famous piano works, such as the sonatas “Waldstein,” “Appassionata,” and “Lebewohl” and Concertos No. 4 and No. 5. He continued to write instrumental chamber music, choral music, and songs into his heroic middle period. In these works of his middle period, Beethoven is often regarded as having come into his own because they display a new and original musical style. In comparison to the works of Haydn and Mozart and Beethoven’s earlier music, these longer compositions feature larger performing forces, thicker polyphonic textures, more complex motivic relationships, more dissonance and delayed resolution of dissonance, more syncopation and hemiola (hemiola is the momentary simultaneous sense of being in two meters at the same time), and more elaborate forms.

When Beethoven started composing again in 1818, his music was much more experimental. Some of his contemporaries believed that he had lost his ability to compose as he lost his hearing. The late piano sonatas, last five string quartets, monumental Missa Solemnis, and Symphony No. 9 in D minor (The Choral Symphony) are now perceived to be some of Beethoven’s most revolutionary compositions, although they were not uniformly applauded during his lifetime. Beethoven’s late style was one of contrasts: extremely slow music next to extremely fast music and extremely complex and dissonant music next to extremely simple and consonant music.

Although this section will not discuss the music of Beethoven’s early period or late period in any depth, you might want to explore this music on your own. Beethoven’s first published piano sonata, the Sonata in F minor, Op. 2, No. 1 (1795), shows the influence of its dedicatee, Joseph Haydn. One of Beethoven’s last works, his famous Ninth Symphony, departs from the norms of the day by incorporating vocal soloists and a choir into a symphony, which was almost always written only for orchestral instruments. The Ninth Symphony is Beethoven’s longest; its first three movements, although innovative in many ways, use the expected forms: a fast sonata form, a scherzo (which by the early nineteenth century—as we will see in our discussion of the Fifth Symphony—had replaced the minuet and trio), and a slow theme and variations form. The finale, in which the vocalists participate, is truly revolutionary in terms of its length, the sheer extremes of the musical styles it uses, and the combination of large orchestra and choir. The text or words that Beethoven chose for the vocalists speak of joy and the hope that all humankind might live together in brotherly love. The “Ode to Joy” melody to which Beethoven set these words was later used for the hymn “Joyful, Joyful, We Adore Thee.”

Quick Guide: Beethoven’s 9th – “Ode to Joy”

Focus Composition:

Beethoven, Symphony No. 5 in C minor, Op. 67 (1808)

In this section, we will focus on possibly Beethoven’s most famous composition, his Fifth Symphony (1808). The premiere of the Fifth Symphony took place at perhaps the most infamous of all of Beethoven’s concerts, an event that lasted for some four hours in an unheated theater on a bitterly cold Viennese evening. At this time, Beethoven was not on good terms with the performers, several of whom refused to rehearse with the composer in the room. In addition, the final number of the performance was finished too late to be sufficiently practiced, and in the concert, it had to be stopped and restarted. Belying its less than auspicious first performance, once published the Fifth Symphony quickly gained the critical acclaim it has held ever since.

The most famous part of the Fifth Symphony is its commanding opening. This opening features the entire orchestra playing in unison a musical motive that we will call the short-short-short-long (SSSL) motive, because of the rhythm of its four notes. We will also refer to it as the Fate motive, because at least since the 1830s, music critics have likened it to fate knocking on the door. The short notes repeat the same pitch and then the long, held-out note leaps down a third. After the orchestra releases the held note, it plays the motive again, now sequenced a step lower, then again at the original pitches, then at higher pitches. This sequenced phrase, which has become the first theme of the movement, then repeats, and the fast sonata-form movement starts to pick up steam. This is the exposition of the movement.

Illustration of music notes for Opening of Symphony No. 5, Op. 67
Opening of Symphony No. 5, Op. 67

After a transition, the second theme is heard. It also starts with the SSSL motive, although the pitches heard are quite different. The horn presents the question phrase of the second theme; then, the strings respond with the answer phrase of the second theme. You should note that the key has changed—the music is now in E flat major, which has a much more peaceful feel than C minor—and the answer phrase of the second theme is much more legato than anything yet heard in the symphony. This tuneful legato music does not last for long and the closing section returns to the rapid sequencing of the SSSL motive. Then the orchestra returns to the beginning of the movement for a repeat of the exposition.

The development section of this first movement does everything we might expect of a development: the SSSL motive appears in sequence and is altered as the keys change rapidly. Also, we hear more polyphonic imitative in the development than elsewhere in the movement. Near the end of the development, the dynamics alternate between piano and forte, and, before the listener knows it, the music has returned to the home key of C minor as well as the opening version of the SSSL motive: this starts the recapitulation. The music transitions to the second theme—now still in the home key of C minor—and the closing section. Then, just when the listener expects the recapitulation to end, Beethoven extends the movement in a coda. This coda is much longer than any coda we have yet listened to in the music of Haydn or Mozart, although it is not as long as the coda to the final movement of this symphony. These long codas are also another element that Beethoven is known for. He often restates the conclusive cadence many times and in many rhythmic durations.

The second movement is a lyrical theme and variations movement in a major key, which provides a few minutes of respite from the menacing C minor; if you listen carefully, though, you might hear some reference to the SSSL fate motive. The third movement returns to C minor and is a scherzo. Scherzos retain the form of the minuet, having a contrasting trio section that divides the two presentations of the scherzo. Like the minuet, scherzos also have a triple feel, although they tend to be somewhat faster in tempo than the minuet.

This scherzo third movement opens with a mysterious, even spooky, opening theme played by the lower strings. The second theme returns to the SSSL motive, although now with different pitches. The mood changes with a very imitative and very polyphonic trio in C major, but the spooky theme reappears, alongside the fate motive, with the repeat of the scherzo. Instead of making the scherzo a discrete movement, Beethoven chose to write a musical transition between the scherzo and the final movement, so that the music runs continuously from one movement to another. After suddenly getting very soft, the music gradually grows in dynamic as the motive sequences higher and higher until the fourth movement bursts onto the scene with a triumphant and loud C major theme. It seems that perhaps our hero, whether we think of the hero as the music of the symphony or perhaps as Beethoven himself, has finally triumphed over Fate.

The fourth movement is a rather typical fast sonata form finale with one exception. The second theme of the scherzo (b), which contains the SSSL fate motive, appears one final time at the end of the movement’s development section, as if to try one more time to derail the hero’s conquest. But, the movement ultimately ends with a lot of loud cadences in C major, providing ample support for an interpretation of the composition as the overcoming of Fate. This is the interpretation that most commentators for almost two hundred years have given the symphony. It is pretty amazing to think that a musical composition might express so aptly the human theme of struggle and triumph. Listen to the piece and see if you hear it the same way.

Before you listen to the entire piece, watch this video which gives an overview.

The secrets of the world’s most famous symphony – Hanako Sawada

Listening Guide: Symphony No. 5 in C Minor, Op. 67

Performed by: (Video of live orchestral performance); The Chamber Orchestra of Europe, conducted by Nikolaus Harnoncourt

  • Composer: Beethoven
  • Composition: Symphony No. 41 in C Major, K. 551 — 1st Movement, Allegro Vivace
  • Date: 1808
  • Genre: Symphony
  • Form: The four movements are as follows:
  1. Allegro con brio: fast, sonata form,
  2. Andante con moto: slow, theme and variations form,
  3. Scherzo. Allegro: scherzo and trio (ABA),
  4. Allegro: fast, sonata form.
  • Performing Forces: Piccolo (fourth movement only), two flutes, two oboes, two clarinets, two bassoons, contrabassoon (fourth movement only), two horns, two trumpets, three trombones (fourth movement only), timpani, and strings (first and second violins, viola, cellos, and double basses)

What we want you to remember about this composition:

  • Its fast first movement in sonata form opens with the short-short-short-long motive (which pervades much of the symphony): Fate knocking at the door?
  • The symphony starts in C minor but ends in C major: a triumphant over fate?

First Movement, Allegro con motto

What we want you to remember about this movement:

  • Its fast first movement in sonata form opens with the short-short-short-long motive (which pervades much of the symphony): Fate knocking at the door?
  • Its C minor key modulates for a while to other keys but returns at the end of this movement
  • The staccato first theme comprised of sequencing of the short-short-short-long motive (SSSL) greatly contrasts the more lyrical and legato second theme
  • The coda at the end of the movement provides dramatic closure.
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
0:00 Full orchestra in a mostly homophonic texture and forte dynamic. Melody starts with the SSSL motive introduced and then suspended with a fermata (or hold). After this happens twice, the melody continues with the SSSL motive in rising sequences. EXPOSITION: First theme
0:28 The forte dynamic continues, with emphasis from the timpani.

Falling sequences using the SSSL rhythm.

Transition
0:50 After the horn call, the strings lead this quieter section.

A horn call using the SSSL motive introduces a more lyrical theme—now in a major key.

Second theme
1:25 SSSL rhythms passes through the full orchestra that plays at a forte dynamic.

The SSSL rhythm returns in down-ward sequences.

Closing
1:35 No Data EXPOSITION: Repeats
3:07 Some polyphonic imitation; lots of dialogue between the low and high instruments and the strings and winds.

Rapid sequences and changing of keys, fragmentation and alternation of the original motive.

DEVELOPMENT
3:56 Music moves from louds to softs Retransition
4:33 Starts like the exposition. but ends with a short oboe cadenza RECAPITULATION: First theme
5:05 Similar to the transition in the exposition but does not modulate. “Transition”
5:28 Now started by the bassoons.

Now in C minor, not E flat major, which provides a more ominous tone.

Second theme
6:07 As above Closing
6:15 After a sudden piano articulation of the SSSL motive, the movement ends in a loud and bombastic manner: Fate threatens.

 

Re-emphasizes C minor.

Coda

Second Movement

What we want you to remember about this movement:

  • It is a slow theme and variations movement
  • Its major key provides contrast from the minor key of the first movement
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
0:00 Mostly homophonic.

Consists of two themes, the first more lyrical; the second more march-like.

Theme: a and b
1:56 More legato and softer at the beginning, although growing loud for the final statement of b in the brass before decrescendoing to piano again. Violas subdivide the beat with fast running notes, while the other in struments play the theme. Variation 1: a and b
 

3:48

Starts with a softer dynamic and more legato articulations for the “a” phrase and staccato and louder march-like texture when “b” enters, after which the music decrescendos into the next variation.

 

Even more rapid subdivision of the beat in the lower strings at the beginning of “a.” Then the “b” phrase returns at the very end of the section.

Variation 2: a and b
6:23 Lighter in texture and more staccato, starting piano and crescendoing to forte for the final variation.

The “a” phrase assumes a jaunty rhythm and then falls apart .

Variation 3: a
7:00 The full orchestra plays forte and then sections of the orchestra trade motives at a quieter dynamic.

The violins play the first phrase of the melody and then the winds respond with its answer.

Variation 4: A
7:50 Full orchestra plays, soft at first, and then crescendoing, decrescendoing, and crescendoing a final time to the end of the movement.

 

Motives are passed through the

orchestra and reemphasized at the very end of the movement.

Coda

Third Movement,Scherzo

What we want you to remember about this movement:

  • It is a scherzo movement that has a scherzo (A) trio (B) scherzo (A) form
  • The short-short-short-long motive returns in the scherzo sections
  • The scherzo section is mostly homophonic, and the trio section is mostly imitative polyphony
  • It flows directly into the final movement without a break
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
0:05 Lower strings and at a quiet dynamics. Rapidly ascending legato melody. Scherzo (A): A
0:27 Presented by the brass in a forte dynamic.

Fate motive.

B
0:55 No Data a b a b
1:59 Polyphonic imitation lead by the lower strings.

Fast melody.

Trio (B): c c d d
3:39 Now the repetitious SSSL theme is played by the bassoons, staccato. Fast melody. Scherzo (A): A
3:50 Strings are playing pizzicato (plucking) and the whole ensemble playing at a piano dynamic.

Fate motive but in the oboes and strings.

B
4:44 Very soft dynamic to begin with and then slowly crescendos to the forte opening of the fourth movement.

Sequenced motive gradually ascends in register.

Transition to the fourth movement

Fourth Movement, Allegro

What we want you to remember about this movement:

  • It is a fast sonata form movement in C major: the triumph over Fate?
  • The SSSL motive via the scherzo “b” theme returns one final time at the end of the development
  • The trombones for their first appearance in a symphony to date
  • It has a very long coda
Timing Performing Forces, Melody, and Texture Text and Form
5:24 Forte and played by the full orches- tra (including trombones, contra- bassoon and piccolo).

Triumph triadic theme in C major.

EXPOSITION: First theme
5:58 Full orchestra, led by the brass and then continued by the strings.

The opening motive of the first theme sequenced as the music modulates to the away key.

Transition
6:23 Full orchestra and slightly softer. Triumphant, if more lyrical, using triplet rhythms in the melody and in G Major. Second theme
6:48 Full orchestra, forte again. Repetition of a descending them. Closing theme
7:20 Motives passed through all sections of the orchestra.

Motives from second theme appear, then motives from the first theme.

DEVELOPMENT
8:15 Piano dynamic with the theme in the winds and thestrings accompanying. Using the fate motive Return of scherzo theme
9:31 Performing forces are as before. C major. RECAPITULATION: First

theme

10:00 Performing forces are as before. Does not modulate. “transition”
10:34 As before. Second theme
11:00 Starts softly with the woodwinds and then played forte by the whole orchestra.

Does not modulate.

Closing theme
11:31 Notice the dramatic silences, the alternation of of legato and stac- cato articulations, and the sudden increase in tempo near the coda’s conclusion: full orchestra.

Lengthy coda starting with motive from second theme, then proceed- ing through with a lot of repeated cadences emphasizing C major and repetition of other motives until the final repeated cadences.

CODA

Adapted from:

Briscoe, James R. Historical Anthology of Music by Women. Indiana University Press, 1986. Project MUSE.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Edited and additional material by Jennifer Bill

Women Composers of the Classical Era

Maria Theresia von Paradis (1759-1824)

By KARIN PENDLE

Maria Theresia von Paradis was born in Vienna, the daughter of Imperial Court Secretary Josef von Paradis and goddaughter of Empress Maria Theresa, for whom she was named. Although she lost her sight at an early age, Paradis acquired the education necessary for a career in music, studying with some of the most prominent musicians of her day. Piano lessons from Leopold Kozeluch, vocal training with Vincenzo Righini and Antonio Salieri, and instruction in theory and composition from Salieri, Abbé Vogler, and Carl Friberth prepared her for her long career as a virtuoso pianist, singer, composer, and teacher. After performing in Vienna at public concerts and private musicales, in 1783 Paradis began an extended European tour that took her to such major musical centers as Paris, London, Hamburg, Berlin, Prague, and Salzburg. Mozart was so impressed with her playing that he undertook to write a piano concerto for one of her Paris concerts. Unfortunately, the work—the Concerto in B-flat major, K.456—did not reach her in time, and Paradis apparently never had the pleasure of performing it.

Paradis ended her concert tour in 1786 and returned to Vienna. Although she continued to perform until she was nearly 50, she never undertook so long and strenuous a journey again. Instead, she turned increasingly to composition, using a pegboard system invented for her by her friend and librettist Johann Riedinger. In addition to the songs she began producing during the years of her grand tour, Paradis wrote operas, cantatas, choral pieces, piano concertos, and chamber and keyboard works. (Two piano sonatas, labeled Opus 1 and 2 and mistakenly ascribed to her, are actually by Pietro Domenico Paradisi, an older contemporary.) Paradis’s works were performed publicly in Vienna and elsewhere, but only some of her songs and a fantasy for piano were published during her lifetime. Manuscripts of several unpublished works, including two of her theater pieces and the piano concertos, are no longer extant.

In 1808 Paradis founded a music school for girls, whose Sunday concerts drew many members of Viennese society. Though she continued to compose until at least 1813, teaching had become her primary musical activity. Intelligent, well-educated, and fluent in several languages, Maria Theresia von Paradis well represents the culture of eighteenth-century Vienna.

Sicilienne

The many minor triads and melodic ornaments in Paradis’s popular “Sicilienne” lend it a sweetly sentimental flavor. Since neither the original manuscript nor any eighteenth-century editions of this work exist, a modern editor, Samuel Dushkin, relying on a manuscript copy of the piece found in the library of a German publishing firm, arranged the “Sicilienne” for violin or cello and piano, and for piano alone.

The charm of Paradis’s “Sicilienne” lies in its melody, particularly in the unexpected chromatic inflections and in the irregular extensions of phrases that lend a spun-out quality not often found in music of this time. The simple chordal accompaniment of the “Sicilienne” merely establishes an atmosphere in which this melodic gem can work its touching magic.

Marianne von Martinez (1744-1812)

By KARIN PENDLE

Vienna-born Marianne von Martinez was only nine years old when the poet and librettist Pietro Metastasio discovered her great musical talents and undertook to supervise her training. To this end he called on Niccolò Porpora and the then-unknown Franz Joseph Haydn to give the young girl lessons in singing, playing keyboard instruments, and composition, while Metastasio himself provided her general education. In addition, Martinez studied counterpoint with Giuseppe Bonno and probably received informal suggestions and guidance from Johann Adolph Hasse.

Marianne was quick to attract the attention of the Viennese court because of her abilities as a performer, and she was only in her teens when an early Mass of her own composition was performed at St. Michael’s, the court chapel. Other works soon followed—oratorios, cantatas, sacred choral compositions, arias, piano concertos, piano sonatas, and a symphony among them. Though her music was performed and much admired, most of Martinez’s compositions remained unpublished; they exist only in the manuscript copies owned by the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde in Vienna.

Charles Burney’s account of the time he spent with Marianne von Martinez during his visit to Vienna in 1772 remains the most extended and enthusiastic appreciation of her skills as a singer, keyboard artist, and composer. It is also a testimony to her intelligence and refinement. Mozart sought Martinez out to perform with him in his piano duets, and singer Michael Kelly paid tribute to her in his memoirs. In 1773 she was made an honorary member of Bologna’s Accademia Filarmonica, which cited the nobility of expression and the amazing precision exhibited in her works. About the same time, she may also have received an honorary doctorate from the University of Pavia.

Though Marianne von Martinez was never a professional musician in the technical sense of the term, she devoted her life to music and the arts. After the death of Metastasio, who left her and her siblings large sums of money, Martinez’s home became a center of artistic life during a truly Golden Age of Viennese music. During the 1790s, when Martinez had apparently ceased to be an active composer, she turned to teaching, and the singing school she opened in her home turned out many fine pupils.

The Sonata in A is one of two piano sonatas by Marianne von Martinez published in 1765 by Johann Ulrich Haffner of Nürnberg. She was only 21 at the time the sonata was printed, but she had learned her lessons well. The three-movement work is written with a sure hand in a style that reveals Martinez’s own facility at the keyboard and the influence of her teacher Haydn.

Licensing & Attributions

“Classical Genres” from Music 101

CC licensed content,

Original • Authored by Elliott Jones. Provided by: Santa Ana College. Located at: http://www.sac.edu

License: CC BY: Attribution

 

“Music of the Classical Period” from Understanding Music: Past and Present by Jeff Kluball and Elizabeth Kramer.

Understanding Music: Past and Present is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Edited and additional material by Jennifer Bill

Media Attributions

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

The Art of Music: Music Appreciation with an Equity Lens Copyright © 2024 by Amy McGlothlin and Jennifer Bill is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book